Midcareer Grant

• Applicants must be permanent or tenured St. Cloud State University faculty and staff.
• Applicants may submit one (1) application. If an application is denied, an individual may re-apply during the next submission period, if eligible.
• Individuals with an active Midcareer Grant are not eligible to apply.
• Applicants must meet eligibility requirements at the time of application, and through the proposed grant activity and potential award period.

Deadline: October 26, 2023 at 4 p.m.

Step 1:  Review the eligibility requirements and budgetary guideline sections of this webpage for this grant. You can also review the
criteria that the review committee uses by viewing the evaluation
rubric.
Estimated Project Budget

Step 2:  Discuss your project and intent to apply with your department chair/director and dean/supervisor as upon submission, your proposal will automatically be routed to them for review and approval.  All approvals (signatures) are facilitated electronically in Wizehive and applications will not be considered without all required approvals.

Step 3a:  Click on the red "Apply Here" button to login to Wizehive using your StarID.

• For assistance using Wizehive, please click on the red "Wizehive Tutorial" button.
• Wizehive allows you to save your progress as you work on completing your application.
• Do not click the "Submit" button until your application is complete.  A complete application includes the finished Application, Estimated Project Budget (download by clicking on red button above), supporting documents and budget justification items, and, if applicable, Co-PI response(s).

Step 3b: If you have one or more St. Cloud State Co-PI's, you are required to complete a Co-PI Request form for each Co-PI participating in the project.  This process will trigger a notification to your Co-PI(s) requiring them to acknowledge participation in the project.

Step 4:  If applicable, confirm your Co-PI(s) have completed their Co-PI Request forms.  You can confirm this by looking for the green box next their name(s) within the Co-PI Request section of your application.

Step 5:  Click on "Submit" to put forward your COMPLETE application for consideration.  It must be submitted prior to the posted deadline above or it will not be considered.

• Changes/updates cannot be made once your application is submitted.
• The application will be automatically routed in Wizehive to obtain the necessary approvals (signatures) from your department chair/director and dean/supervisor.
• To ensure timely reviews, it is the applicant's responsibility to ensure department chairs/directors and deans/supervisors know the application is coming.

Step 6:  Once your completed application is electronically approved in Wizehive by your department chair/director AND dean/supervisor, your application will be distributed to a review panel for review and consideration.  Please note that the review process takes time, so please be patient.  Updates will be sent out as soon as the review process is concluded.

DISCLAIMER: Applicants are encouraged to submit their electronic application early to avoid potential access issues. Applications after the deadline will not be considered without official confirmation of campus-wide accessibility/technical outages. Previous versions of application forms will not be considered and will be denied.

• The budget will be evaluated on how well requested expenses are connected and justified to accomplish project objectives and activities.
• Cost accuracy is important and undefined estimates will not be considered.
• Use appropriate budget categories as defined within the templates provided, and include calculation details.
• The budget justification describes –
  • Responsibilities and estimated time for each for personnel included.
  • Connections between the requested budget expenditures and objectives or activities they support.
  • Concise description of the need for each requested item in carrying out the proposed project.

Allowable Costs:

• Supplies required for the project (purchases remain property of St. Cloud State University).
• Only highly specialized equipment may be considered. Applicants must include written justification of the need including confirmation that existing campus resources are not available for use or checkout from University Library or ITS (purchases remain property of St. Cloud State University).
• Non-conference travel related to the project.
• Personnel (e.g., clerical/student salary/applicant compensation and fringe costs).
  • Compensation of up to $2,000 for the applicant is allowed. It should be calculated into the budget as $2,000 compensation + $440 (22% fringe) and should not exceed $2,440.
  • Funds CANNOT be used to reduce the applicant’s workload.
• Other identifiable costs
  • If you request compensation for an expert outside of St. Cloud State, you must provide the individual’s credentials, justification for the award, and explanation of your relationship with the individual.
  • Purchased services. 

Unallowable Costs:

• Conference travel 
  • Applicants are encouraged to utilize professional development funds or are welcome to apply for Saigo Excellence Funds when presenting at a conference.  Student presenter(s) are eligible to apply to the Student-Mentor Collaboration grant competition.
• Technology that is available for checkout through the University Library or ITS, including computers, laptops, tablets, and printers.

• The Scholarship, Research, and Creative Achievement Committee will review the proposals. Funding recommendations are then provided to the Associate Provost for Research and Dean of Graduate Studies, who will make the final funding decisions.
• Reviewers may take the following into consideration: the quality of the proposal and the project; the likelihood that the project will be completed; the likelihood that the grant will lead to future external funding; and the likelihood that the project will lead in the foreseeable future to a publication/grant submission or a significant contribution to student learning.
• Proposals are reviewed using the criteria outlined in the Evaluation Rubric in the Grant Instructions section of the Proposal Package.
• Given proposals of comparable ratings, greater consideration is placed on those applicants who have not previous received funding through this program.

• Awarded funds are to be used exclusively for the work outlined in the proposal narrative.  Any modifications to the proposal must be reported to Research and Sponsored Programs by completing a Modification Form
• Final Report:
  • Recipients are responsible for submission of a Final Report within 60 days after the project's scheduled completion date. 
  • The report should clearly demonstrate that the work has moved the applicant towards peer-reviewed dissemination of their work, or the submission of a proposal for external funding.
  • The report is accessed through Qualtrics, therefore, responses do not save unless submitted.
  • The following information is collect on the Final Report:
    • Project title
    • Principal investigator information: email, department, school/college/unit
    • Co-Principal investigator information: email, department, school/college/unit
    • Project completion date
    • Award amount granted and expended
    • Activities, measurable goals and objectives achieved by the project
    • Benefits of the project
    • How funds were spent to support the project
    • Outcomes/benefits of the project assisted with your professional development goals
    • Project next steps/dissemination plans

2023 Recipients

Martin Lo - $4,750
Teacher Development, “Examination of a Play-based Learning Curricula Integrating Developmental Benefits in Free-play and Academic Value”

2022 Recipients

Ettien Koffi - $4,744
English, "Acoustic Phonetic Taxonomy of Infant Cry: Description, Technology, and Intervention"

Matt Davis - $7,312
Biology, "Phylogenomics of Anglerfishes and the Evolution of Novel Feeding Strategies"

Scott Miller - $6,300
Music, "Recording Graphic and Augmented Reality Scores"

2021 Recipients

John Sinko - $4,887
Physics & Astronomy, “Laser Removal of Dimensional Orbital Debris”

2020 Recipients

Marina Cetkovic-Cvrlje - $7,938
Biology, "Type 1 Diabetes and Baking Soda?"

Jiang-Ping (Jeff) Chen - $2,653
Mathematics & Statistics, "Reasoning in the Tradition of the Nine Chapters - a New Translation and Study of a Chinese Mathematical Classic and its Commentaries"

Matthew Davis - $7,920
Biology, "Biogeography of the Three-barbeled Catfishes (Heptapteridae: Rhamdia) Across Middle America"

Amy Hebert Knopf and Kathy Johnson - $5,000
Community Psychology, Counseling and Family Theraphy and Special Education, "Development and Assessment of Global Competencies for Students who are Deaf: Confucius Classroom Network of Schools for the Deaf"

Kristian Twombly - $7,590
Music, "Residency, Composition, and Recording Project"

2019 Recipients

Kelly Branam Macauley - $3,307
Anthropology, “Final Revisions, Constitution-Making in Crow County”

Scott Miller - $8,000
Music, “Recording with TAK Ensemble on New Focus Recordings”

Heiko Schoenfuss - $7,946
Biology, “Improving the Sustainability of Aquaculture in Ghana through Environmental Quality Assessment”

Ilya Simakov - $7,986
Theatre and Film Studies, “Film Adaptation of Olga Breininger Short Story”

Lindsey Vigesaa and Mary Clifford - $7,930
Criminal Justice, “Enhancing Grant Proposals through Research, Partnerships, and Mentoring: A Pilot Project to Extract and Organize Data from files of Clergy Credibly Accused of Sexual Abuse”

Ben Witts - $3,771
Community Psychology, Counseling, and Family Therapy, “Understanding the Feedback Loop between Infant Colic and Shaken Baby Syndrome”

Younsook Yeo - $7,655
Social Work, “Exploring Female Somali Refugees' Perspectives On Their Patient Experiences With U.S. Healthcare Systems: Community-Based Participatory Research”

2018 Recipients

Kathryn Johnson and Amy Hebert Knopf - $8,000
Special Education, “Including and Engaging Students with Disabilities”

Matthew Julius - $5,428
Special Education, “Identifying vulnerable entry points into the marine food web and ecological consequences”