5.16.2 Technical Support – Colleges,
Administrative and Student Service Units
Background
The current nature of technical support on campus needs to be defined so that
SCSU can plan and develop a coordinated technical support infrastructure for SCSU
within the next five years. This planning must address how to ensure responsive,
comprehensive, up-to-date, and discipline-sensitive technical support for various
units across campus. Planning also must take into consideration compliance with
appropriate use standards.
Technologists provide valuable services to students, faculty, staff, and administration.
Specifically, they work directly with users on particular projects and problems
and are generally assigned to college or administrative units. This structure ensures
that technologists develop a greater understanding of the technology environment
of the people they support. Additionally, each college/administrative unit technologist
spends part of the week (approximately 3-4 hours) at the Miller Center HelpDesk.
This contact with university-wide support staff provides a wider perspective of
technology advances and challenges across campus and enables these individuals
to facilitate a high level of communications about current and evolving technology
across campus. Finally, technologists provide leadership and coordination to ensure
that various users' technology needs are met.
Currently, full-time college technicians are assigned in the Colleges of Business
(COB), Education (COE), and Fine Arts/Humanities (COFAH). A half-time technologist
is assigned in the College of Social Sciences (COSS), and the College of Science
and Engineering (COSE) does not have a college technologist although some departments
within COSE have technologists. Some departments in the COSE have little if any
technical support other than the HelpDesk. This lack of technical support has lead
to a number of problems, particularly for COSE computer labs. The anticipated expanded
demand for Geographical Information Systems (GIS) software across campus may require
increased technical support, and it’s likely that the current level of support
in some colleges with full-time technologists is still insufficient. In addition
to these needs within the colleges, Student Life and Development has requested
full-time technical support. Other administrative units might benefit from more
locally assigned technical support too. Although additional staffing may seem costly,
additional technical support strategically placed can actually reduce downtime
and save money.
An additional area of concern is legal use of software and hardware. Technologists
have varying levels of understanding and training in the areas of quality assurance
and compliance with copyright and appropriate use policies. Since the institution
is held to legal standards, technologists must be trained to maintain standards
of appropriate use of technology across campus and in their assigned units.
Goals
The following goals provide a framework for evaluating the needs and efficacy
of assigning technologists to colleges and administrative units. Annual review
is part of the process, but a final evaluation will be completed in five years.
- A campus-wide audit of technology support needs will identify college, administrative,
and student service units that are under-supported and review the collaborative
reporting model.
- Each of the five colleges will have sufficient full-time technical support person
to meet user needs based on the technology audit.
- Based upon the audit, the Provost will identify and assign appropriate funding
for hiring technologists and supporting current and newly hired positions (including
salary, equipment, other resources, and ongoing training of staff).
Specific Actions and Timeline
By the end of September 2003, the Provost will establish a committee that
includes representatives of all stakeholders, including the Dean of LR&TS
and Director of CIS-AdC, to evaluate the technology support needs in college,
administrative, and student service units. The committee will adhere to the following
schedule rather than the standard timeline for carrying out and reporting on
specific actions:
- Based upon the audit, the Dean of LR&TS and the Director of CIS-AdC will establish
unit priorities and a timeline for hiring new technologists. They will also evaluate
and establish a framework to ensure timely and adequate training of current and
newly hired technologists.
- By March 15, 2004, the Dean of LR&TS and the Director of CIS-AdC will report
to the TLTR, who will review the report and offer implementation suggestions.
- After review by the TLTR, the Dean of LR&TS and the Director of CIS-AdC will
forward recommendations to the Provost by April 15, 2004.
- In consultation with the Dean of LR&TS and affected college deans and/or appropriate
supervisors in administrative units, the Provost will assign appropriate funding
for hiring and training as well as adequate resources for current and newly hired
technologists.
- By August 15, 2004, the first position(s) will be filled and individuals trained.
Additional positions will be filled based on funding to ensure newly hired technologists
are on duty by August 15th of each subsequent year.
- The process of filling the identified positions should be completed by August 15,
2007.
- During the 2007/2008 academic year, the committee will conduct a follow-up audit
of technology support to assess the model of college/administrative technologist.
By March 15, 2008, the committee will provide a report to the Dean of LR&TS,
the Director of CIS-AdC, other college deans, and supervisors of administrative
units employing technologists.
- By April 15, 2008, the deans and supervisors will evaluate the report and submit
a final report to the Provost with future recommendations for technology support.
Resources
The process outlined above will allow the university to determine the number of
technologists needed to provide effective technology support to all units. The
costs listed below are per position for salary, benefits, equipment, and training.
Additional staff training will be an ongoing cost and will be scaled based on the
number of positions.
Per staff costs in 2002/2003 dollars (which should be adjusted for inflation):
| Full-time position |
$52,000 |
| Annual training of current/new staff – annualized |
4,000 |
Evaluation
- Has the initial audit been completed and the results and recommendations
forwarded to TLTR, the Dean of LR&TS, the Director of CIS-AdC, and the Provost?
- Has the Provost assigned appropriate funding for hiring, training, and equipping
current and newly hired technologists?
- Have the recommended technologists been hired and trained?
- Has the follow-up audit of technology support been completed, including assessment
of the model of college/administrative technologists? Have recommendations regarding
technology support been made based upon this audit and forwarded to the Provost?
Revised: May 2003