5.16.1 Technology Support - HelpDesks
Background
Coordination and support for the various HelpDesks on campus need to be evaluated
so that SCSU can ensure sufficient staff and resources to provide optimum effectiveness
for the various HelpDesks on campus.
Five HelpDesks on campus and one off campus provide services to various users.
Most users are familiar with the Miller Center HelpDesk, which provides campus-wide
software and hardware support. The Reference Desk (also in the Miller Center) helps
users locate and acquire information and answers numerous technology related questions.
The Open Computer Lab HelpDesk on Miller Center second floor (commonly referred
to as MC 201), assists students and faculty working in the open lab — and
those in adjoining computer classrooms — with software and hardware in those
spaces. The ResNet HelpDesk provides student support services relative to Internet
connections.
| Service Area |
Hours per wk |
Staffed by |
Audience |
| MC HelpDesk |
77 |
Staff and students |
Students, faculty, staff, and community members |
| Reference Desk |
76 |
Faculty |
Students, faculty, staff, and community members |
| ResNet |
69 |
Students |
Students in the residence halls |
| Miller Center Computer Lab Desk |
93 |
Students and
Faculty/GA roving |
Students, faculty, and staff |
| CIS-AdC HelpDesk |
43 |
Staff |
Administrative and student service staff |
Additionally, the Center for Information Systems, also known as administrative
computer services (CIS-AdC), provides a HelpDesk and two full time technologists
to support administrative and student service areas of the campus. Finally, an
ISRS/MnSCU HelpDesk, representing a system-wide resource, is available off campus
and funded by the Chancellor's office. In other words, the various HelpDesks fulfill
specific service needs, and the interactions among these units facilitate coordination — enabling
staff to resolve user problems, answer questions, and identify reoccurring concerns
that can lead to development of services and training to address user needs.
The operations of these various HelpDesks should be evaluated. Evaluation should
include (but may not be limited to) scope of service provided by each HelpDesk,
delivery of services, service hours, staffing resources, staff training, user satisfaction,
communication within each HelpDesk unit, communication among HelpDesk units, and
communication to users of services available. (See 5.7 Communication about Technology.)
Goals
- Evaluate the operations of each HelpDesk
- Determine optimum staffing and operations for each HelpDesk, including
- scope of services provided
- service hours
- use of student workers
- training for all employees
- coordination among HelpDesks
- interaction among campus technologists
- delivery of support
- technology upgrades
- new technology applications to enhance support
- Allocate resources to accomplish optimum staffing and operations for each HelpDesk
- Evaluate current user satisfaction procedures and update or refine if necessary
- Establish continuous quality assurance procedures for technologist training and
user satisfaction
Specific Actions and Timeline
TLTR will establish a committee to evaluate HelpDesks across campus. This committee
will be composed of staff from the HelpDesks and various users.
- The committee will follow the standard timeline (see 5.0) for carrying out and
reporting on specific actions.
- The committee will determine the "current" state of training, support
and barriers to delivery of services and report their findings in a work plan to
TLTR, the Dean of LR&TS, and the Director of CIS-AdC. Multiple approaches to
information collection are recommended: some examples are open forums for HelpDesk
staff, users and both; focus groups with staff, users and both; online surveys
of staff and users’ needs and problems.
- After consultation with TLTR on the committee work plan, the Dean of LR&TS
and the Director of CIS-AdC will establish unit priorities and a timeline for implementing
them. These might include hiring, continuous technologist training, HelpDesk coordination,
acquisition of new technology for newly hired and current technologists, or other
strategies that will allow the various HelpDesks to continue providing excellent
service.
- As needed, the Dean of LR&TS and the Director of CIS-AdC will report progress
on the work plan to TLTR and re-evaluate. On an annual basis, the Dean of LR&TS
and the Director of CIS-AdC will review progress with the Provost and determine
resources necessary for the next academic year.
- During 2007/2008, the committee will submit a final report and recommendation for
the next cycle of technology based on the standard timeline.
Resources
The cost to implement coordinated training, support, and a service evaluation plan
will need to be determined by HelpDesk staff with input from users. At this time,
it would be unwise to provide specific resource needs, either in personnel or supplies/equipment,
until an analysis of needs has been completed.
Below are the current personnel costs as a guide for that component of requested
resources.
Per staff costs in 2002/2003 dollars (which should be adjusted for inflation):
| Full-time position |
$52,000 |
| Annual staff training – annualized (est.) |
4,000 |
Evaluation
- Has the committee developed an evaluation process and used it to make
recommendation?
- Have administrative personnel read and responded to the committee’s recommendations
and facilitated implementation?
- Has training, coordination and user satisfaction improved over the past five
years?
- Has the process outlined by the Master Plan been effective in accomplishing improvements
in technology support? If not, what recommendation would committee and/or Administrative
personnel make for the next Master plan?
- Has the committee submitted a final report to TLTR in the spring of 2008?
Revised: May 2003