|
 |
 |
 |
Panel Presentation Guidelines
|
 |
Panel presentations are intended to explore one topic. The topic should
be narrow enough that one abstract would summarize the entire panel. The panel
format is ideal for class projects on related topics. The goal
of the panel is to discuss one topic in depth. This may mean examining
an issue from different perspectives or discussing different examples
of the same phenomenon. Because presentations can be vary in terms of
relatedness, the format for panel presentations is more flexible than
paper presentations. There is no time limit on individual presentations
but the entire session can be no longer than 90 minutes including time
for questions.
Panelists should inform the moderator of the session about the order
of presentations, the approximate length of each panelist's presentation,
and how the panel would like to handle questions (i.e., should the audience
ask questions after each presentation or wait until all the panelists
have spoken). Individual titles for papers given during a panel will be published in the Colloquium Proceedings.
Below are two examples of past panels.
Social Identity as It is Shaped by Group Membership
This panel consists of a group of speakers who will read from works they wrote
in Social Psychology (SOC 365) for Assistant Professor Mariah Tenamoc. The
focus is on how group membership shapes a person's identity. People are simultaneously
members of many groups classified largely as the "human race," to the most
intimate two-person groups as "spouses" or "parent-child," for instance.
Particular characteristics may be demonstrated to be considered the "heart" of
a particular group membership. There may be social acts making group members
easily recognizable. Particular to most groups are symbolic characteristics
and shared meanings, sometimes observed in common terminology. Group memberships
influence or contribute to a members' standards, attitudes, and aspirations.
Each panelist will report on an individual's identity as it has been shaped
by a particular group membership. The panelists provide contextual information
about the group and more precisely discuss how an individual they each identified
responded to various questions about group membership and its influence on
identity.
Panelists:
- Sydney Awe, "Case Study: Married for 25 Years"
- Emily Bezdicek, "Case
Study: A High School Football Coach"
- Niki Frohman, "Case Study: A Single Mother"
- Shawna Lien, "Case Study: A Single Father Trying to Gain Custody
of His Son"
- Audra Magel, "Case Study: Being Gay"
- Christina Roe, "Case Study: An African Immigrant"
- Kristen Waisley, "Case Study: An Interracially Married Couple"
Faculty Sponsor(s):
Using Web Pages to Facilitate Learning about the History of
the Theatre
During fall semester of 2001 the co-requisite courses of Theatre
History I and Drama I developed Web pages using Netscape Composer and/or
Adobe Page Mill to research a topic regarding the history of the theatre.
The first panelist researched actors and theatre conventions in early
Greek theatre and during the renaissances that occurred all throughout
Europe. This panelist dealt with different theatre conventions of the
periods and how they affected the actors and roles portrayed by actors.
The second panelist investigated research mask usage in the theatre for
multiple eras. The assertion was that masks were used throughout theatre
history for various purposes. This research covered the use of theatrical
masks from Greek Tragedies to Japanese Noh Theatre to the Italian Commedia
dell'Arte. The final panelist studied the methods in which actors provided
input into theatrical performances and how this input changed over time.
Using Web pages provided a context for information from a variety of
sources that should help students to better understand the environments
the actors worked in.
Panelists:
- Jenny Sather, "Theatre Conventions and Actors"
- Aimee Wendt, "The Role of Masks in Theatre"
- Eli Ebb, "Actors and Collaboration in the History of Theatre"
Faculty Sponsor(s):
Hints
- Give an overview about the panel's topic before any individual presentation
is given. The overview should assist the audience in understanding how the
individual papers are related.
- Give a summary after all the panelists are finished presenting. The
summary is an opportunity to integrate the different ideas or perspectives
and to discuss the significance of the conclusions of the panelists.
- Discuss beforehand as a panel the order and length of each presentation
as well as the transition between speakers (i.e., how will the panelists
know when it is their turn to present). It is also helpful to discuss
who will be giving the overview and who will be doing the closing or
summary.
- For suggestions on the format of individual panel presentations,
see Paper Guidelines.
|