II.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The St. Cloud Teacher Quality Enhancement partnership will
create lasting improvements in the preparation of teachers in Central Minnesota.
The initial months of activity have focused on studying and sharing the
theoretical underpinnings of the three major initiatives we are undertaking. In
sharing our vision and work plan with other educators, the TQE staff has made 32
presentations to school superintendents, school administrative teams, PreK-12
faculty, university faculty and local school boards to inform colleagues of the
opportunities available to them through this initiative. The ground-work has
been laid for successful implementation and each initiative is moving forward.
The St. Cloud Teacher Quality Enhancement partnership
focuses on three major initiatives to improve the preparation of teachers and
student achievement throughout Central Minnesota. These three initiatives
target improvements at four levels – PreK-12 students, teacher candidates,
PreK-12 faculty and university faculty.
§
Co-teaching impacts pre-service teachers, university
faculty, PreK-12 faculty and PreK-12 students.
§
Mentoring impacts new teachers and PreK-12 faculty.
§
Professional Development impacts PreK-12 faculty,
pre-service teachers and university faculty.
Co-Teaching
The majority of our efforts in the first six months have
been in preparing to implement co-teaching at three levels: the university
level, P-12 level and undergraduate level.
University Level Co-Teaching: Three co-teaching
specialists were selected from a number of applications. These specialists are
university faculty representing the different departments in the College of Education that have student teaching – Teacher Development, Child and Family
Studies and Special Education. The co-teaching specialists developed
application criteria for the university level co-teaching opportunities and
disseminated these among university faculty. Three co-teaching pairs were
selected from the applications: two special education methods courses and one
human relations course which is required for all teacher candidates. Each pair
included one university faculty member and one P-12 faculty member. Co-teachers
all attended an initial workshop where they were able to study the seven models
of co-teaching and explore together how co-teaching could best be implemented
in their classroom. The rationale behind university level co-teaching is to
expose as many future teachers as possible to the co-teaching model, to better
prepare them to be classroom collaborators themselves. Over 100 university
students completed pre and post questionnaires and were overwhelmingly positive
about their experience. (Mid term evaluation is attached, Final evaluation will
be forwarded upon receipt from external evaluator.) The co-teaching specialists
have completed a rubric for scoring future applications, and another three
pairs of co-teachers have been selected for Fall of 2004 – one Child and Family
Studies, one Special Education and one Human Relations.
P-12 Level Co-Teaching: We had initially hoped to
have teacher candidates co-teaching with cooperating teachers in the Spring of
2004. It quickly became apparent however, that for this initiative to be
successfully implemented, more time would have to be spent in providing
in-service training and full-day workshops to participants. The response from
cooperating teachers in the public school systems has been outstanding, with 131
teachers expressing interest in participating. (Our original goal was 60).
These teachers will all attend a full day workshop in either June or August to
learn more about the methods and strategies of co-teaching, and will return for
a half-day session in the fall which will be done in conjunction with their
teacher candidate. Measurement methods have been more clearly defined and we
have been granted permission to use the Woodcock-Johnson III Research Edition
assessments to measure changes in academic achievement. The first cohort of
teacher candidates being placed in co-teaching situations will occur in
September, 2004.
Undergraduate Level Co-Teaching: Again, it is our
hope to expose as many teacher candidates to co-teaching as possible through
this project. Undergraduate level co-teaching provides opportunities for
content area departments (Math, Language Arts, Science, Physical Education,
etc.) to develop a co-teaching initiative where their upper level students
co-teach an entry level course with the university faculty. Environmental and
Technology Studies has been doing this for a number of years, and has lent their
expertise to developing a framework for other departments. In Fall, 2004 the
Math Skill Lab courses will be co-taught.
Mentoring
This piece of the TQE initiative has not received as much
focus in the first six months of implementation. The Co-Director from District
742 and the Professional Development/ Mentoring Specialist from the university
held a meeting of mentors from the St. Cloud School District to build a base of
understanding as to what currently exists and what role TQE could play in
enhancing the mentoring experience for teachers in their first three years. The
Co-Director from the St. Cloud School district will lead this initiative and
has a meeting scheduled this summer to bring other mentoring experts from
surrounding districts together to begin the discussion of how to all work
together.
One of the major accomplishments in the area of mentoring
has been in redefining the role of the TQE Leaders and the cadre of Building
Contacts that will be developed. Rather than provide enhanced learning and
mentorship opportunities to a few people every year, the research indicates
that lasting change is more likely to be sustained if there is a committed and
knowledgeable core or educators in each district and in each school who can
serve as the conduit between new teachers, cooperating teachers and the
university. The focus of enhancing content and pedagogical knowledge for
teachers remains, but the means to achieve that focus has been improved.
Professional Development
Much time has been spent in the early months of this project
in studying the research in the area of professional development for educators.
It is clear from the research that one-shot in-service opportunities is not the
most effective way of achieving professional growth and development. In
response to the literature, the St. Cloud TQE partnership has asked each of the
cooperating school districts to provide 1 to 3 professional development
specialists to come together as a consortium to study professional learning
communities and discuss the implementation of learning communities in their
context. The consortium will meet on a regular basis, to be determined by
members’ determination of need, and will share information about ongoing
professional development efforts in their respective districts.
In addition to facilitating the consortium, the TQE
initiative will pilot a professional learning community, which will be
established with a group of teachers and SCSU faculty who will spend a year
reading, meeting, and learning together. The topics for discussion will be
determined by the group. Personal reflective journals will document the growth
of those involved. We are also exploring partnering with two local districts on
their delivery of the American Federation of Teachers professional development
courses.