St. Cloud State University

Conclusion
Campus Master Planning: Facilities Utilization
Draft-11/23/98, REV. 7/10/1999, 1/18/2000, 2/7/2000

Some of these initiatives can be pursued independently but most are related to each other. The funds to advance these initiatives would come from two main sources, the operating budget and the Capital Improvement budget. Capital budget expenses for new buildings and major renovations require University participation in one third of the debt service so this impact on operating budgets must also be considered. New facilities impact the need for maintenance staff and utilities. Both of these also increase demands on operational budgets.

Some of the initiatives taken together would represent "double counting" of the expense. For example, the planning initiatives for buildings could be funded out of the proposed increase in R&B funding. The one time planning expenses could be funded out of the increased level of R&B funding. The following spreadsheet breaks down the estimated costs into appropriate categories:

Budget Initiative		Operating One Time $	CIP $
1.	Space Principles	0	0
2.	6 Block Area	0	1,250,000
3.	R&B, R&R Plan	0	0
4.	R&B Funding	0	0
5.	Maint. Staff	0	0
6.	New Lib Expan	0	600,000
7.	Centennial Pre-Design	20,000	0
8.	Revise PMP	15,000	0
9.	Plan Bookstore	0	0
10.	Plan Signage	20,000	0
11.	Install Signage	Undet.	Undet.
12.	CIP/HEAPR Projects	0	26,792,000.
13.	Reassign SH, BB	20,000	0
14.	Reassign AS	20,000	Undet.
15.	Reassign BH	20,000	Undet.
16.	Reassign EB	0	0
17.	Plan Resue of Bookstore	10,000	Undet.
18.	Reassign AMC	5,000	0
19.	Plan Reuse of Whitney	10,000	Undet.
20.	Plan Housing & Child Care	15,000	Undet.
21.	Plan Fac. Serv. Space	10,000	Undet.
	Total	165,000	28,642,000.